A recent story in The Guardian regarding the state of 3D printing is generating some controversy.
The story, entitled, āHas the 3D printing revolution finally arrived?ā, made me squirm a bit after reading the title. Itās been some years since Iāve seen a major media publication issue a headline of that type, and that was way back when the consumer 3D printing craze was at its height.
As the story writes:
āYou probably read an article around 2012 that predicted how every home would soon have a 3D printer that we would use for all manner of ingenious tasks. OK, well that didnāt happen.ā
The story then goes on to explain that since then the technology has been gradually increasing in use by industry, particularly aerospace, automotive and even sports equipment. They cite examples such as hearing aids, teeth aligners and others as ways the tech has āinveigling its way into our livesā.
The story asks the question, āHas the 3D printing revolution finally arrived?ā and that irked myself and others in the industry.
SLM Solutionsā Director of Global Marketing, Emily DeSimone said on LinkedIn:
āI must say I really despise this question or similar questions whether ā3D printing is ready for serial productionā āis 3D printing revolution hereā etc. I think itās time to celebrate how far weāve come! There is still much to do but letās not turn a blind eye to the real industrial scale applications that are out there.ā
Emily is entirely correct. There is no technological milestone about to be achieved. It was already achieved years ago.
Whatās really happening is that industry has yet to UNDERSTAND the technology fully so that they can LEVERAGE it for their business.
There are ā and have been for years ā many businesses taking full advantage of the technology. There are also many, many more business that have not yet done so.
But they could.
To me the so-called ārevolutionā is not a technological thing. Instead itās simply the ratio of people that āget itā to people that donāt.
This has been the struggle of 3D printer manufacturers for decades: how to āturn onā new customers by having them discover the benefits of the technology. Itās easy to adopt a new technology if oneās competitor is benefiting from it. But what if none of your competitors is doing so? What if no one sets the initial example? Conservative business leaders tend to not want to change things unless theyāre broken. Thatās why the ārevolutionā has been slow in coming.
Perhaps this will change as the number of applications and domains using the tech increases.
Is this really a revolution? I think not, and recall the wise words of author William Gibson, who said:
āThe future is already here; itās just not evenly distributed.ā
Via The Guardian