A lively discussion erupted recently over the terminology used to refer to our favorite technology. As you’ve probably noticed, manufacturers use all manner of words to describe their particular form of digital manufacturing. We’ve heard terms like: “Rapid Manufacturing”, “Rapid Prototyping”, “3D Printing”, “Additive Fabrication” and many variations. Terry Wohlers believes that the term “3D Printing” will eventually win the terminology wars.
Our opinion? We agree completely. While there may be more technically accurate terms, such as the delightful “solid freeform fabrication”, the general public will more likely key on something that relates to their current understanding. Today everyone knows what “printing” means. It is a very small step to say “3D Printing”. We’ve tried this by mentioning such terms to neophytes, who tend to get “3D Printing” much more easily than other terms. 3DP it is.
Now then, how did “Bluetooth” ever slip in?
Via Terry Wohlers and Mass Customization
and the winner is…. “3d printing”
I also believe (like my colleagues here at Fluid Forms, Frank Piller, as well…) 3d printing will be the umbrella term mostly used for additive production methods.
rapid prototyping…maybe insiders, technicians and academics will go on using this term (though they don’t seem to be really happy with it) but the masses won’t use it…
We’d agree with you on that one, Andy – RP clearly can be applied to, well, anything that quickly creates temporary items. But that’s the thing – “prototyping” means temporary, not-final objects, even though some are using the tech to produce “final” objects these days in short manufacturing runs.
Surely rapid prototyping is a more general term that could include other technologies?