Sponsors

Recommended
  • 3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator SE (Standard Edition) 3D Navigation Device USB ( 3DX-700028 )
    3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator SE (Standard Edition) 3D Navigation Device USB ( 3DX-700028 )
    3D Connexion
  • The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto
    The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto
    by Kevin A. Carson
  • Mastering Blender
    Mastering Blender
    by Tony Mullen
  • Kindle Wireless Reading Device (6
    Kindle Wireless Reading Device (6" Display, Global Wireless, Latest Generation)
    Amazon.com
  • Blender 3D 2.49 Incredible Machines
    Blender 3D 2.49 Incredible Machines
    by Allan Brito
  • Makers
    Makers
    by Cory Doctorow
  • 3Dconnexion SpacePilot PRO - 3D motion controller - 31 button(s) - wired - USB
    3Dconnexion SpacePilot PRO - 3D motion controller - 31 button(s) - wired - USB
    3D Connexion
  • Making it Big in Software: Get the Job. Work the Org. Become Great.
    Making it Big in Software: Get the Job. Work the Org. Become Great.
    by Sam Lightstone

Entries in zcorp (38)

Tuesday
Aug102010

ZCorp Questions Open Source Printers

  • Share
A post from Olimpio DeMarco, VP of Research and Development at ZCorp questioned the possibility of using open source 3D printers for business use. He says: 
 
Who then is buying open source FDM printers? It isn’t clear to me that there is an industrial, true business application for open source 3DP.
 
He's probably correct at this point, but as with everything else in the open source universe, it's a moving target. Open source solutions inexorably get better because there are a great many people working on them. In the software world, the same questions were asked about, for example, web server software. In the end, Apache's HTTP server software essentially took over the market because its features and cost (zero) slurped up the majority of the market. 
 
Here's what we're wondering: with this post from ZCorp are we seeing the big guys take notice of these open source solutions? Is this the first 3D printing FUD
 

 

Follow us on Twitter - Subscribe to our Feed

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Tuesday
Aug032010

Which Desktop 3D Printer Do I Buy? Part One

  • Share
Editor: We are totally tickled to present our very first guest post - and we're greatly honoured to have it written by well-known 3D Printing blogger Joris Peels. Most recently Joris was the Shapeways Community Manager, and now he's blogging at Voxelfab. Over the past few years Joris has written extensively on 3D printing helping the community immensely and has a wealth of knowledge and experience to share with us. This is part one of a two-part post. Enjoy!
 
This is actually not an easy question. As Fabbaloo just reported the benchmarking of 3D printers has begun in earnest. When you compare 3D printers you are actually comparing very different production technologies, however. The right 3D printer for you is as much about who you are as it is about the relative merits of the technology or system. 
 
To illustrate this let's imagine we are a medium sized US architecture firm and want to buy an in-office easy-to-use 3D printer in order to prototype the buildings we plan to construct. Lets limit our shortlist to 3 of the biggest brands and their entry level systems.
 
Zcorp 310
 
I'm intentionally leaving out the new Zprinter 150 & the Zprinter 250 since they're so new they currently don't have a track record. The Zcorp Zprinter 310 is a tried and true legacy system by Zcorp. It prints a fine plaster powder using an inkjet head. The material cost is the lowest in the industry and the system costs $20,000. Unlike most other Zcorp printers this prints monochrome. The parts are not very strong and have to be infused or cured after printing. 
 
The Good 
  • Cheap to buy & run 
  • Build speed is quick
 
The Bad
  • Very weak parts & parts could break during production. 
  • Very thick wall thicknesses needed for a lot of parts (<2mm) .
  • Many things can simply not get made with Zcorp. 
  • Post processing required so overall speed to get a part finished is slow
  • Separate depowdering & infusion stations required
 
Who is it for? 
People very worried about TCO. 
 
Recommendation: If you want to get the cheapest option in the long run you might want to consider this printer. But, it will not wow our architect's clients and together with post processing will not be easy in an office environment.
  
Also consider:  the Zprinter 650
 
On the other end of the Zcorp spectrum we have the Zprinter 650. This comes in at $100,000 if you add in all the post processing and other gadgetry you need. This prints color and the colors are much clearer than other older Zcorp systems. This system allows you to remove the Zcorp powder within the system. This would be a good system for a larger architectural firm that wants to put in the extra effort in terms of financing and manpower that this system would require. The system would benefit from a trained operator as especially the post-processing steps can be finicky. A lot of geometries can not be made with Zcorp so this is a limitation. I would recommend this system for a larger architectural office that makes a lot of models to show to customers. The color is unique and would help make a mall or other building shown in situ much more compelling. 
 
Dream Customer: AEDAS 
 
You can follow Joris Peels on Twitter here or read his 3D printing blog VoxelFab here.    
 
Editor: Stay tuned for part two tomorrow, where Joris will express his opinion of the Dimension uPrint and the Objet Alaris 30. 

Follow us on Twitter - Subscribe to our Feed

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Monday
Jul262010

ZCorp Chases HP?

  • Share
Perhaps shocked by HP's recent entry into the low-cost commercial 3D Printer market, ZCorp has released two new models that are very inexpensive. The ZPrinter 150 prints only in monochrome, but the price is right: only USD$14,900 gets you one of these babies in your office. 
 
Monochrome isn't sufficient for your technicolor object dreams? Just pull out another ten large and you'll be able to have the ZPrinter 250 instead. It prints in color. 
 
ZCorp points out that these printers:
  • Have a small footprint to fit in tinier spaces
  • Easy to use
  • Five times the resolution (of what, we're not sure, but it's 300 x 450 dpi)
  • Have the industry's lowest operating cost per model (likely due to their ability to print multiple, stacked models in a single run)
  • Reasonable build chamber of 23.6 x 18.5 x 12.7 cm
 
These printers are available today. Isn't competition wonderful?
  
Via ZCorp (Hat tip to Rednarb)

Follow us on Twitter - Subscribe to our Feed

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Monday
Jun212010

ZBuilder Ultra Introduced

  • Share
It's a brand new, lower-cost option from ZCorp for building objects - but it uses a very different approach. It's not like their 3D printers, which use a fused-powder technique. Instead the ZBuilder Ultra uses "a high-resolution Digital Light Processor (DLP) projector to solidify a liquid photopolymer", similar to laser sintering. 
 
Here's the specifications highlights:
 
  • Accuracy within 0.2mm
  • Simplified mechanics: only the Z-platform moves; the DLP illumination handles the X-Y axis
  • Extremely fine detail: minimum feature size is only 138 microns, due to the DLP resolution. Smooth!
  • Apparently twice as fast as competing systems
  • Each layer operation is the same in duration, as the DLP lights up the entire surface at once; no extra waiting if you're printing several parts
  • Reasonably generous build size 26.0 x 16.0 x 19.0 cm
 
We're quite intrigued with this new "parallel" building approach, which upon some thought seems a lot more like "printing" than "depositing". Perhaps this speedy new approach will be used in other devices to come? 
 
The new 163Kg (360 lb) device will be available in July at a cost of USD$34,900. That's a lot more than hobbyists can afford, but the unique features of this device will surely be attractive to many manufacturing companies. 
 
Via ZCorp

Follow us on Twitter - Subscribe to our Feed

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Saturday
Apr172010

The Most Popular 3D Printer Brands & Manufacturers?

  • Share
A strange post appeared last week on Red Chill Media where they listed their thoughts on the "Top 4 Most Popular 3D Printer Brands & Manufacturers". Their list included:
  1. Objet
  2. Z Corporation
  3. Desktop Factory (!)
  4. Dimension/Stratasys
We're not sure we'd agree with this list, particularly item 3, Desktop Factory. While DT was highly touted and did good work, they ceased to exist some time ago, after being absorbed by industry giant 3D Systems (hm, where are 3D Systems on the list?) 
 
So who are the leading 3D print vendors these days? We'd have to split this into two very distinct categories: Commercial, where high-quality devices demand high prices, and Hobbyist, where incredibly inexpensive gear is used by a large and growing crowd. 
 
First, our list of commercial 3D printer vendors:
 
 
And our list of hobbyist 3D printer vendors/projects:
 
 
No, they're not ranked. We have no way of knowing the relative size of these organizations. How would you measure them, anyway? Annual revenue? That would disqualify the open source projects. Media Coverage? Number of prints? Features & quality? All of these organizations offer benefits and challenges, and you must choose the one that fits your needs best. As for us, we decided to list them using an undebatable system: alphabetical. Enjoy!
 
Related Posts with Thumbnails
Tuesday
Feb162010

The Sculpteo 3D Printing Service

A new European 3D print service has emerged: Sculpteo. This friendly service appears to compete with Shapeways, as it offers not only a straightforward method of uploading your designs, but also has a "community gallery" from which you may choose pre-made designs. 
 
Once your design is set:
 
You choose the material, the monochrome or coloured printing, the final size. We automatically estimate the price, and once your order is confirmed, we are able to elaborate your object.
 
What materials do they offer? It's based on the two different printer models they use: the Formiga P100 and a ZCorp 650. The Formiga prints "plastic, flexible when the object is fine, and very solid (for example to elaborate a ball bearing)" and the ZCorp has "a high-performance compound, which has the appearance of a plaster casting (for example to elaborate interior design objects)". Standard materials for these printers. 
  
Their software is evidently able to automatically correct simple 3D model problems in order to correctly print. However, if the problem is beyond their ability to automatically correct, they'll send it back to you for repairs. 
For now it appears they ship only to Europe. 
 
Via Sculpteo 

 

Monday
Jan042010

An Introduction to 3D Printing

Anthony Lockwood of Desktop Engineering writes a review of a white paper from ZCorp that explains in 2D print form the entire process of 3D printing for beginners.

While the PDF paper is somewhat (well, quite a lot actually) slanted towards ZCorp's line of 3D printers, it is very well written for those who are unfamiliar with the concept of 3D printing and want more than just a consumer view. Beautiful diagrams accompany the text to illustrate each step in the process, be they microscopic or office-sized.

The paper explains the beginnings of 3D printing at ZCorp, and then sails smoothly through each step in the process of producing a coffee cup. From design, printing and finishing, it's a great read.

Via Desktop Engineering and ZCorp

Friday
Nov272009

Matt is BetaMaterialised



Matt Sinclair of We Dont Do Retro writes of his experience using the beta 3D printing service from Materialise, called "i.materialise".

The beta service proudly announces their manifesto:

We love 3D printing and are excited by amazing designs. That's why we developed the i.materialise platform. An online service making 3D printing as easy as printing on paper.


That, of course, is the goal of every 3D printing service: to make it easy to do. It's quite difficult, and each service attempts to tackle that mountain in a different way.

Matt's experience was based on his attempt to print a potentially challenging children's book character. Among his findings:

  • Unspecified file limits, and had to guess at maximum resolution - but it turns out there are no limits
  • Expressed concerns regarding whether i.materialise is correctly determining the feasibility of printing a pathological object. However, it's apparently fixed manually if necessary
  • Orientation is apparently non-changable, at least for now, meaning you cannot use the standard trick of rotating the object to take advantage of higher resolutions along one axis of printing
  • Encountered difficulties in attempting to use the color capabilities of i.materialise's ZCorp printer due to the monocolor preview

We're with Matt on this one: is this a service for professional designers or consumers? While it appears to be an excellent service, it seems to have a little of each in it. Some 3D print services are so clear on their target market that non-targeted visitors would immediately recognize they don't belong there. But this is a beta service and the purpose is to test and improve the service, so stay tuned!

Via We Don't Do Retro and i.materialise (Hat tip to Bart)