Sponsors

 

Recommended
  • Rule 34
    Rule 34
    by Charles Stross

    Stross delves into a possible future where 3D printers become commonplace - and explores the problems that could result. 

  • Printing in Plastic: Build Your Own 3D Printer (Technology in Action)
    Printing in Plastic: Build Your Own 3D Printer (Technology in Action)
    by James Floyd Kelly, Patrick Hood-Daniel
  • 3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator SE (Standard Edition) 3D Navigation Device USB ( 3DX-700028 )
    3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator SE (Standard Edition) 3D Navigation Device USB ( 3DX-700028 )
    3D Connexion
  • The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto
    The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto
    by Kevin A. Carson
  • Mastering Blender
    Mastering Blender
    by Tony Mullen
  • Kindle Wireless Reading Device (6
    Kindle Wireless Reading Device (6" Display, Global Wireless, Latest Generation)
    Amazon.com
  • Blender 3D 2.49 Incredible Machines
    Blender 3D 2.49 Incredible Machines
    by Allan Brito
  • Makers
    Makers
    by Cory Doctorow
  • 3Dconnexion SpacePilot PRO - 3D motion controller - 31 button(s) - wired - USB
    3Dconnexion SpacePilot PRO - 3D motion controller - 31 button(s) - wired - USB
    3D Connexion
« BfB Captures RepRap Designer | Main | UP! A Personal Portable 3D Printer »
Thursday
Aug122010

3D Printing Standards and Jailbroken Materials

A couple of interesting articles provoked some thinking about 3D printing standards. First, we have a post by the Open3DP folks, who complain that they'd like to use different types of print material in their 3D printers. They are, of course, known for experimenting with all kinds of unusual print materials. They suggest standards for 3D print materials should emerge, perhaps even with an "App store for Materials". In this way we could mix and match material and try to get the most out of our printers. Otherwise we're stuck "jailbreaking" materials or simply buying them from the manufacturer. 
 
We think in practice this could be rather tricky, since the 3D Printing is an inherently mechanical, chemical and thermal process, devices tend to be aligned toward their specific print materials and vice versa. Financially, we suspect many commercial 3D Printer manufacturers make a ginormous portion of their revenue from print cartridges, and they likely don't want to give that pseudo-monopoly up anytime soon. 
 
Meanwhile, Scott Crump of Stratasys debates the new industry standard term, "Additive Manufacturing", as set by the ASTM International F42 standards subcommittee on terminology for our industry. From Scott:
 
The new term is not intended to eliminate terms like 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing, which are subsets of additive manufacturing. You can “prototype” with an additive manufacturing system. 
 
What we're thinking is that this industry is getting dangerously close to the point where many standards should be emerging. Customers, manufacturers and we suspect even hobbyists would benefit from standards. Where will they come from?
 

Reader Comments (2)

Anyone curious about this stuff in the NYC area — next month at the World Maker Faire we’ll have a 3D Printer Village with at least a dozen variations on this printer and others printing sample pieces all weekend. We’ll also be building a few printers live with pubilc help over the two days.

January 20, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterCarl Cassette
January 20, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterCarl

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>