Sponsors

Recommended
  • Rule 34
    Rule 34
    by Charles Stross

    Stross delves into a possible future where 3D printers become commonplace - and explores the problems that could result. 

  • Printing in Plastic: Build Your Own 3D Printer (Technology in Action)
    Printing in Plastic: Build Your Own 3D Printer (Technology in Action)
    by James Floyd Kelly, Patrick Hood-Daniel
  • 3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator SE (Standard Edition) 3D Navigation Device USB ( 3DX-700028 )
    3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator SE (Standard Edition) 3D Navigation Device USB ( 3DX-700028 )
    3D Connexion
  • The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto
    The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto
    by Kevin A. Carson
  • Mastering Blender
    Mastering Blender
    by Tony Mullen
  • Kindle Wireless Reading Device (6
    Kindle Wireless Reading Device (6" Display, Global Wireless, Latest Generation)
    Amazon.com
  • Blender 3D 2.49 Incredible Machines
    Blender 3D 2.49 Incredible Machines
    by Allan Brito
  • Makers
    Makers
    by Cory Doctorow
  • 3Dconnexion SpacePilot PRO - 3D motion controller - 31 button(s) - wired - USB
    3Dconnexion SpacePilot PRO - 3D motion controller - 31 button(s) - wired - USB
    3D Connexion
« Boing Boing's Bong Debate | Main | Golden 3D Prints with Shapeways' Midas Touch »
Thursday
May202010

Fabbaloo Survey Results

Readers may recall we issued a survey the other week, attempting to duplicate 3D Systems' survey by using the same questions. The responses have slowed, so it's time to take a look at the results, which you can see by clicking on the chart for a larger view.
 
The highlights, as we see it:
 
  • The number one characteristic is clearly quality of prints, over all other others. This means that people would pay more for a printer that spits out better models
  • The number two and three most important characteristics relate to cost. Both initial and ongoing costs were pegged as important, demonstrating that Fabbaloo readers are sharp; you weren't fooled by the "free razor, you just pay for the blades" scenario
  • Build speed turns out to be less important, perhaps because at this point everyone accepts that 3D printers just take a long time to print
  • Build size is surprisingly low rated. We suspect this is because readers realize that a larger build chamber automatically means more cost, which we previously saw was a non-starter
  • Trailing the pack is "Leading Brand". Evidently all the advertising by 3D Systems, Dimension, Objet and the other leading brands might not be as effective as they believe
 
How do our answers compare to the answers collected by 3D systems? We have no idea, but if anyone from 3D Systems is listening, we'd love to compare notes.
 
Thanks to all who participated!

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>