Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/fabbaloo.com/httpdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Battery Printing « Fabbaloo

Battery Printing

By on July 17th, 2009 in blog

Tags:

 

Leslie Gordon of Machine Design.com writes on the possibilities of printing electronics, and specifically batteries.

We all know that 3D printers can easily create cases for electronics, but what about the electronics themselves? This is difficult to achieve on traditional one-material-at-a-time 3D commercial printers, but experiments being undertaken by the fab kit makers is beginning to yield some results. According to Gordon, it’s now possible to print a battery:

Researchers developed a battery with zinc as the anode and air as the cathode because of the designā€™s simplicity.

First came development of a zinc-powder suspension that did not clog the syringe nozzle. Next came designing the separation layer between the anode and cathode. In commercial batteries, this layer is often paper. In contrast, the layer in the zinc-air battery is made from ceramic slurry or a synthetic resin.

These 3D printed batteries are apparently only half the capacity of commercial equivalents, but it’s definitely a great start. We think the most interesting aspect would be the ability to print batteries of any shape – suitable to include within designs with limited volume.

Via Machine Design.com

By Kerry Stevenson

Kerry Stevenson, aka "General Fabb" has written over 8,000 stories on 3D printing at Fabbaloo since he launched the venture in 2007, with an intention to promote and grow the incredible technology of 3D printing across the world. So far, it seems to be working!

4 comments

  1. Version 1.0 is 50% as good as our current best. I think that's well enough for proof-of-concept, the rest is just a matter of how much money they throw at the problem.

Leave a comment