Sponsors

Recommended
  • Rule 34
    Rule 34
    by Charles Stross

    Stross delves into a possible future where 3D printers become commonplace - and explores the problems that could result. 

  • Printing in Plastic: Build Your Own 3D Printer (Technology in Action)
    Printing in Plastic: Build Your Own 3D Printer (Technology in Action)
    by James Floyd Kelly, Patrick Hood-Daniel
  • 3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator SE (Standard Edition) 3D Navigation Device USB ( 3DX-700028 )
    3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator SE (Standard Edition) 3D Navigation Device USB ( 3DX-700028 )
    3D Connexion
  • The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto
    The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto
    by Kevin A. Carson
  • Mastering Blender
    Mastering Blender
    by Tony Mullen
  • Kindle Wireless Reading Device (6
    Kindle Wireless Reading Device (6" Display, Global Wireless, Latest Generation)
    Amazon.com
  • Blender 3D 2.49 Incredible Machines
    Blender 3D 2.49 Incredible Machines
    by Allan Brito
  • Makers
    Makers
    by Cory Doctorow
  • 3Dconnexion SpacePilot PRO - 3D motion controller - 31 button(s) - wired - USB
    3Dconnexion SpacePilot PRO - 3D motion controller - 31 button(s) - wired - USB
    3D Connexion
« ZCorp's Good, Bad and Ugly | Main | SOLIDO »
Monday
Apr202009

Two Routes to Low Cost

 
Fluid Forms poses an interesting question: how to obtain an inexpensive 3D printer. They correctly point out the two possible courses of action for obtaining inexpensive 3D printing solutions:
  • Commercial units, such as the Desktop Factory and MCOR printers.
  • Open Source hardware solutions such as RepRap, Fab@Home and the recently announced MakerBot

The problem, of course, is that the commercial options are not really options yet. In fact, Desktop Factory is currently undergoing financial difficulties and it is unclear that their offering will ever appear, as much as all of us would like it to.

There's a third option not mentioned by Fluid Forms, being use of a 3D print service such as Shapeways, Ponoko and others. While they have large communities and are easily usable, they may not be exactly inexpensive. The popular 3D print services all seem to use the expensive commercial 3D printers (Z Corp, Dimension, Objet, etc) and the costs of those devices (and their associated consumables) is inevitably passed on to the print user.

Fluid Forms' solution was to opt for an Open Source offering, either MakerBot or RepRap. While this might seem depressing if you've been hoping for an inexpensive commercial offering, we're not so certain. If MakerBot and RepRap gain vast legions of users, it's likely that improved products could emerge from their space. These could be commercial offerings based on the inexpensive Open Source hardware.

Software companies do this all the time, so why not hardware companies?

Via Fluid Forms

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>